Published
5 years agoon
In a national survey conducted by The Pew Charitable Trusts, it was found that 95% of consumers 18 and older are demanding more of manufacturers in terms of providing information on what goes into each product. That said, nearly 70 percent of consumers believe that the FDA is not fully successful in keeping said products away from households.
Figure 1: Obtained from The Pew Charitable Trusts. The bar chart looks at the sentiments expressed by adult consumers in terms of the different supplements that exist.
Based on Figure 1, 71% of adults feel dietary supplements are pretty safe, with as little as 14% considering them as extremely safe. The least confidence consumers have is in weight loss supplements (25% pretty safe and 1% extremely safe), followed by the sexual performance (37% pretty safe, and 2% extremely safe) and sports supplements (53% pretty safe and 5% extremely safe). This shows that most consumers have little confidence that the supplement industry offers completely safe products.
The above sentiment was heavily reflected when asked how successful the FDA was in overseeing products that enter the market. As seen in Figure 2 below, 71% of those who’ve used supplements trust that the FDA is not able to keep consumers safe from harmful products.
Figure 2: Obtained from The Pew Charitable Trusts. This bar graph compares the sentiments of supplements users and nonusers. The percentages reflect how adult consumers feel about the FDA's ability to protect consumers from harmful products.
Interestingly, those who have never tried supplements have conveyed similar sentiments. This is not of a surprise given that consumers are less to purchase goods if they lack confidence in them. Finally, the survey concludes that consumers want the FDA to place more restrictions and have more oversight on products that enter the market.
That said, consumers are not fully blaming the FDA for what enters the market, as equal importance has been given to manufacturers. As per Figure 3, 88% of consumers believe that manufacturers should be very responsible, followed by the FDA (75%) and retailers (33%). When generally speaking of responsibility, consumers feel manufacturers have the most responsibility (97%), then comes the FDA (94%) and retailers (71%).
Figure 3: Obtained from The Pew Charitable Trusts. This bar graph shows that consumers don't believe the FDA is completely at fault and that manufacturers and retailers also have the responsibility to protect consumers from harmful products. Additionally, a pie graph looking at retailers’ knowledge of products was also provided.
One would assume that retailers would not be blamed for, as they are the intermediary between manufacturers and consumers. However, this is not the case. Consumers want retailers to be knowledgeable about the products they sell, as only 37% believe they know whether a product is safe or not.
Finally, consumers who’ve used or continue to use supplements have expressed strong support in several areas to ensure harmful products do not make it to their households. Some of the areas that consumers have expressed support in include:
Figure 4: Obtained from The Pew Charitable Trusts. Possible solutions consumers feel can help protect the supplements market are reflected above. The percentages express support/opposition when it comes to manufacturer transparency, Congress' role in funding and costs cleared by more than just taxpayer dollars.
In summary:
To see the whole post from PEW, click here.
Featured Image Courtesy: Branimir76/Getty Images
Disclaimer: Please understand that any news, guides or reviews found here are not a worthy substitute for medical advice. It is extremely wise to consult with a licensed healthcare professional or physician before adding any new health product or program to your routine. No supplements or services here are intended to diagnose, cure or prevent any disease.
Disclosure: Links located within this website may be affiliate placements where referral rewards will be generated if you make a purchase. This adds no additional cost to you and does not change the outcome of the research or review, but goes back into site upkeep and team sustainability.